Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alexander Sorondo's avatar

I read this story on my phone before work and thought it was remarkable and then, embarrassingly, only hours later realized, "Oh and they HAVE pets," that the pet-name title has a very obvious double-meaning that just went completely over my head because of the amazingly *nested* feeling in this whole story. There's the kernal of the pet name issue, and of the characters' relationship, that then gets wrapped in some details of their respective romantic pasts, and then we come back to the kernal issue, which is expanded/made complicated by the pets, and then we get wrapped in the details of how these pets (or their avatars) factored into earlier relationships, those questions of safety/nurturing/etc.

There's this imagery over and over of the two lovers wrapped and snug in bed together with the dogs and there's something about the way the story's constructed that...it kinda mirrors that? Like the way the issue at the center keeps getting wrapped up in all these other details, other anecdotes, earlier loves--they're all about affection, and holding, and bonding. This is the only thing I've ever read that seems to EXIST under blankets.

I once found a weird gray block at a thrift store, it was $1, so I scanned it with Google Lens and it turned out to be like a $400 Lenovo charging dock. I picked it up and walked it to the register feeling like a criminal. Bought it for $1. Walked out and got to my car and didn't quite believe I was holding it.

That's kinda the feeling I have about this story. Like I just popped into my local hangout and found a legitimately capital-G great short story. But I don't wanna draw attention to my own enthusiasm?

I've been thinking about this on and off for the 20ish hours since I read it.

Scott Rees's avatar

This felt to me like a river of voice: thought, memory, desire, humor, fear—moving fast, almost faster than you can keep track of it, and somehow never losing its footing.

What I admire most is how unforced the language feels. This is the kind of voice-driven fiction that can so easily tip into contrivance, and here it just doesn’t.

There’s a real ease to the way it unfolds. It’s confident without being showy, intimate without trying to charm. Nothing stops to explain itself or translate what it’s doing for the reader. The prose trusts its own momentum, and you can feel that trust as a reader.

And it just swept me up.

And the ending, I love it. It doesn’t resolve or explain. It stops while everything is still happening: words still being said, dogs still breathing, the present still fragile and alive. The story refuses to step back and turn the moment into something finished.

We aren’t spared the knowledge that loss is coming—we’re spared having to watch it happen. The story stops short, and suddenly the weight shifts. We carry the rest.

The ending isn’t avoiding pain. It’s holding onto the conditions that made the writing possible in the first place.

Some stories don’t end because they’re finished. They end because that’s as much tenderness as the moment can bear.

18 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?