9 Comments
User's avatar
Alexander Sorondo's avatar

Very much appreciate someone writing a review of the written life of a writer and saying, "Listen. We're all writers here." There's also a fluency here that shows an easy familiarity with how this genre works -- and it's a relief to see someone kinda irked at lazy lit bios like this, cuz it seems there's been a strange flux of em. I recently read a flaccid one about Elmore Leonard, another about Ray Bradbury (I think his wife of half a century was mentioned twice in 400 pages). I get the biographers' enthusiasm is what compels them toward the undertaking, but I guess it's like Sontag says in the camp essay: you should love something a lot but also kinda hate it if you're gonna write something interesting. (You landed this with a perfect choice of closer, btw.)

Max Callimanopulos's avatar

Haha. Ronald Knox said that you should write biographies about people you love, novels about ones you hate. I do think you’re right about the issue with this DJ bio and others being their biographers surfeit of enthusiasm for their subjects, but in particular re Denis, I just don’t think he wanted a biography written of him. Vs Naipaul collabed with Patrick French on his bio and the result is one of the best books ever. Denis died really suddenly and made no plans for a biographer. It’s a shame, bc he deserves a proper treatment. Thank you for your kind words and for reading my piece so carefully! Cheers

Alex Kalamaroff's avatar

I once read Stefan Zweig's memoir World of Yesteryear and in 350 pages he mentioned either of his wives a total of like three times -- and he and Lotte committed suicide together!

Greg's avatar

Nice piece, with which I must quibble twice but only once with any substance. How is it that someone sees writing as "inimitable" yet a sentence later "thinks 'I could do that'"? Am I misunderstanding inimitable?

Richard Brautigan was not a "mediocre prose-poet" he was a fragment of larger genius shot off by some other spirit that broke under the weight of its brilliance. He also was, truly, inimitable. At least I think he was.

Max Callimanopulos's avatar

Actually good catch. That’s a typo. It should be imitable. And as for Brautigan, to each their own

Michael Preedy's avatar

Ok, I’ll admit it: Denis Johnson had somehow passed me by before this. But maybe, as you say, that’s no bad thing if I’m coming to Gestures without any expectations? Where would you send a beginner though to read Johnson himself - Jesus’ Son?

Max Callimanopulos's avatar

No wrong place to start. He goes down easy. You can read Jesus’ Son in an hour or two and then if you’re feeling ambitious, I’d recommend Tree of Smoke. Good summer reading project.

Michael Preedy's avatar

Great - thank you!

Patrick Trombly's avatar

He doesn't get as much credit as Parish, Bird or McHale, but he was an important piece of the puzzle....

;-)